Evaluation of a Customised Online Learning Environment – A Student Perspective

Robert Oliwa

doi:doi:10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Evaluation of a Customised Online Learning Environment – A Student Perspective

Robert Oliwa

Published in Education Journal (Volume 11, Issue 2)

Received: 21 January 2022 Accepted: 7 February 2022 Published: 4 March 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The present study aimed to examine how students evaluate the online learning environment after eight months of its use. The scope and functionalities of the online platform had been recommended by its future users in the process of the platform design and construction. Once the platform was implemented, it constituted the main instructional means in the pandemic period and is being considered to be further used in post-COVID, hybrid model of education. The students who participated in the study encompassed all the undergraduate and postgraduate students of a medium sized tertiary institution. The data was collected with the help of an online survey tool. The online surveys were distributed to all the students after eight months of the distance instruction and made available for the period of four months. The author wished to examine and assess the outcomes concerning the students’ perception of the platform in three areas, namely teaching remote classes, conducting student evaluation and reporting their activity. The study revealed positive opinions relating to being given an opportunity to continue studies during the pandemic, the accessibility of online resources and the functionalities the platform offers. Less approving views were expressed in relation to the online communication tools, the methods of teaching and assessment as well as the opportunity to improve IT competence. A possible direction which the contemporary education might take is hyflexing of teaching and learning (Hybrid-Flexible or Hyflex model) which combines the traditional in-class interaction, online synchronous sessions and asynchronous content delivery.

Published in	Education Journal (Volume 11, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12
Page(s)	63-69
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Online Platform, Environment, Assessment, Learning, Post-pandemic

References

[1]	Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am. Psychol. 37, 122–147. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.
[2]	Bast, F. (2021). Perception of Online Learning Among Students From India Set Against the Pandemic. Frontiers in Education. 6. 10.3389/feduc.2021.705013.
[3]	Bayrak, F., Tibi, M., H., & Altun, A. (2020). Development of online course satisfaction scale. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21, 110-123.
[4]	Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality. London: Penguin Books.
[5]	Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M. & Surkes, M. A. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Rev. Educ. Res. 79, 1243–1289. doi: 10.3102/0034654309333844.
[6]	Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning Teacher Competence Frameworks to 21st Century Challenges: The Case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education 54 (3): 356–369. doi: 10.1111/ejed.12345.
[7]	Cojocariu, V. M., Lazar, I., Valentin, N. & Lazar, G. (2013), SWOT analysis of E-learning educational services from the perspective of their beneficiaries. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, Elsevier B. V., Vol. 116, pp. 1999-2003, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.510.
[8]	Comas-Quinn, A., Arcos, de los B., & Mardomingo, R. (2012). “Virtual learning environments (VLEs) for distance language learning: Shifting tutor roles in a contested space for interaction”. Computer Assisted Language Learning Vol. 25. Issue 2, pp. 129-140.
[9]	Craig, S. (2018). Tutoring and intelligent tutoring systems. Mesa, AZ: Nova Science Publishers.
[10]	Downing, K. J., Lam, T., Kwong, T., Downing, W., & Chan, S. (2007). Creating interaction in online learning: a case study. ALT-J 15, 201–215. doi: 10.1080/09687760701673592.
[11]	Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., Thompson, J., Kramer, L., DeCantis, G., & Hermsdorfer, A. (2015). Student satisfaction with online learning: Is it a psychological contract? Online Learning, 19 (2). https://doi.org/ 10.24059/olj.v19i2.496.
[12]	Hall, B. (2003). New Technology Definitions. http://www.brandonhall.com/public/glossary/index.htm.
[13]	Joshi, S. C,. & Rose, G. (2018). Information Technology, Internet Use, and Adolescent Cognitive Development. 3rd International Conference on Computational Systems and Information Technology for Sustainable Solutions (CSITSS), 22-28, http://doi: 10.1109/CSITSS.2018.8768780.
[14]	König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J. & Glutsch, N. (2020) Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43: 4, 608-622, DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650.
[15]	Krajka, J. 2021. Teaching grammar and vocabulary in COVID-19 times: Approaches used in online teaching in Polish schools during a pandemic. The JALT CALL Journal, 17/2 112–134. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v17n2.379.
[16]	Mills, K. L. (2016). Possible effects of Internet use on cognitive development in adolescence. Media and Communication, vol. 4, no. 3, 4–12.
[17]	Moreno, V., Cavazotte, F., & Alves, I. (2017). Explaining university students’ effective use of e-learning platforms. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 48, 995–1009.
[18]	O'Connor, L. (2015). Learning Management System Definition and Bloom’s Taxonomy. http://www.vcamp360.com/learning-management-system-definition-and-blooms-taxonomy/.
[19]	Oliwa, R. (2020). Design and management of the virtual learning environment for foreign language instruction in adult learner groups. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
[20]	Oliwa, R. (2021). The process of designing the functionalities of an online learning platform – a case study. Jarek Krajka, Chris Alexander (eds), Teaching English with Technology, 21 (3), 101-120, http://www.tewtjournal.org.
[21]	Ouadoud, M., Rida, N. & Chafiq, T. (2021). Overview of E-learning Platforms for Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering, Science & IT (iJES), 9 (1), pp. 50–70. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v9i1.21111.
[22]	Passey, D., & Higgins, S. (2011). Learning platforms and learning outcomes – insights from research. Learning, Media and Technology, 36 (4), 329-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2011.626783.
[23]	Rabiman, R., Nurtanto, M., & Kholifah, N. (2020). Design and Development E-Learning System by Learning Management System (LMS). Vocational Education 9, 1059–1063.
[24]	Rajabalee, Y., B., & Santally, M., I. (2020). Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy. Education and Information Technologies, 26: 2623–2656.
[25]	Rizvi, Y., & Nabi, A. (2021). Transformation of learning from real to virtual: an exploratory-descriptive analysis of issues and challenges. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning. Vol. 14 No. 1, 2021. pp. 5-17. Emerald Publishing Limited 2397-7604. doi: 10.1108/JRIT-10-2020-0052.
[26]	Rouse, M. (2005). Essential Guide: Talent Management System Essential Guide. http://searchfinancialapplications.techtarget.com/essentialguide/Talent-management-system-essential-guide.
[27]	Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J. & Leipzig, R, M. (2006). The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 81 (3): 207–12.
[28]	Shadiev, R. & Yang, M. (2019). Review of Studies on Technology-Enhanced Language Learning and Teaching. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/524/pdf.
[29]	She, L., Ma, L., Jan. A, Sharif, N. H. & Rahmatpour, P. (2021). Online Learning Satisfaction During COVID-19 Pandemic Among Chinese University Students: The Serial Mediation Model. Front. Psychol. 12: 743936. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743936.
[30]	Tomczyk, Ł., Potyrała, K., Włoch, A., Wnek-Gozdek, J. & Demeshkant, N. (2020). Evaluation of the Functionality of a New E-Learning Platform vs. Previous Experiences in E-Learning and the Self-Assessment of Own Digital Literacy. Sustainability. 12. 10219. 10.3390/su122310219.
[31]	Turula, A. (2016). The thin-walled university of the 21st century. Prace Naukowe Akademii im. Jana Długosza w Częstochowie. Pedagogika. 25. 31-44. doi: 10.16926/p.2016.25.02.
[32]	Weller, M. (2007). Virtual Learning Environments. London: Routledge. p. 5.
[33]	Zheng, M., Bender, D. & Lyon, C. (2021). Online learning during COVID-19 produced equivalent or better student course performance as compared with pre-pandemic: empirical evidence from a school-wide comparative study. BMC Med Educ 21, 495 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02909-z.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Robert Oliwa. (2022). Evaluation of a Customised Online Learning Environment – A Student Perspective. Education Journal, 11(2), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Robert Oliwa. Evaluation of a Customised Online Learning Environment – A Student Perspective. Educ. J. 2022, 11(2), 63-69. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Robert Oliwa. Evaluation of a Customised Online Learning Environment – A Student Perspective. Educ J. 2022;11(2):63-69. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12,
  author = {Robert Oliwa},
  title = {Evaluation of a Customised Online Learning Environment – A Student Perspective},
  journal = {Education Journal},
  volume = {11},
  number = {2},
  pages = {63-69},
  doi = {10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.edu.20221102.12},
  abstract = {The present study aimed to examine how students evaluate the online learning environment after eight months of its use. The scope and functionalities of the online platform had been recommended by its future users in the process of the platform design and construction. Once the platform was implemented, it constituted the main instructional means in the pandemic period and is being considered to be further used in post-COVID, hybrid model of education. The students who participated in the study encompassed all the undergraduate and postgraduate students of a medium sized tertiary institution. The data was collected with the help of an online survey tool. The online surveys were distributed to all the students after eight months of the distance instruction and made available for the period of four months. The author wished to examine and assess the outcomes concerning the students’ perception of the platform in three areas, namely teaching remote classes, conducting student evaluation and reporting their activity. The study revealed positive opinions relating to being given an opportunity to continue studies during the pandemic, the accessibility of online resources and the functionalities the platform offers. Less approving views were expressed in relation to the online communication tools, the methods of teaching and assessment as well as the opportunity to improve IT competence. A possible direction which the contemporary education might take is hyflexing of teaching and learning (Hybrid-Flexible or Hyflex model) which combines the traditional in-class interaction, online synchronous sessions and asynchronous content delivery.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Evaluation of a Customised Online Learning Environment – A Student Perspective
AU  - Robert Oliwa
Y1  - 2022/03/04
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12
T2  - Education Journal
JF  - Education Journal
JO  - Education Journal
SP  - 63
EP  - 69
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2619
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12
AB  - The present study aimed to examine how students evaluate the online learning environment after eight months of its use. The scope and functionalities of the online platform had been recommended by its future users in the process of the platform design and construction. Once the platform was implemented, it constituted the main instructional means in the pandemic period and is being considered to be further used in post-COVID, hybrid model of education. The students who participated in the study encompassed all the undergraduate and postgraduate students of a medium sized tertiary institution. The data was collected with the help of an online survey tool. The online surveys were distributed to all the students after eight months of the distance instruction and made available for the period of four months. The author wished to examine and assess the outcomes concerning the students’ perception of the platform in three areas, namely teaching remote classes, conducting student evaluation and reporting their activity. The study revealed positive opinions relating to being given an opportunity to continue studies during the pandemic, the accessibility of online resources and the functionalities the platform offers. Less approving views were expressed in relation to the online communication tools, the methods of teaching and assessment as well as the opportunity to improve IT competence. A possible direction which the contemporary education might take is hyflexing of teaching and learning (Hybrid-Flexible or Hyflex model) which combines the traditional in-class interaction, online synchronous sessions and asynchronous content delivery.
VL  - 11
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Robert Oliwa

East European State Higher College in Przemy?l, Przemy?l, Poland

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Robert Oliwa. (2022). Evaluation of a Customised Online Learning Environment – A Student Perspective. Education Journal, 11(2), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Robert Oliwa. Evaluation of a Customised Online Learning Environment – A Student Perspective. Educ. J. 2022, 11(2), 63-69. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Robert Oliwa. Evaluation of a Customised Online Learning Environment – A Student Perspective. Educ J. 2022;11(2):63-69. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12,
  author = {Robert Oliwa},
  title = {Evaluation of a Customised Online Learning Environment – A Student Perspective},
  journal = {Education Journal},
  volume = {11},
  number = {2},
  pages = {63-69},
  doi = {10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.edu.20221102.12},
  abstract = {The present study aimed to examine how students evaluate the online learning environment after eight months of its use. The scope and functionalities of the online platform had been recommended by its future users in the process of the platform design and construction. Once the platform was implemented, it constituted the main instructional means in the pandemic period and is being considered to be further used in post-COVID, hybrid model of education. The students who participated in the study encompassed all the undergraduate and postgraduate students of a medium sized tertiary institution. The data was collected with the help of an online survey tool. The online surveys were distributed to all the students after eight months of the distance instruction and made available for the period of four months. The author wished to examine and assess the outcomes concerning the students’ perception of the platform in three areas, namely teaching remote classes, conducting student evaluation and reporting their activity. The study revealed positive opinions relating to being given an opportunity to continue studies during the pandemic, the accessibility of online resources and the functionalities the platform offers. Less approving views were expressed in relation to the online communication tools, the methods of teaching and assessment as well as the opportunity to improve IT competence. A possible direction which the contemporary education might take is hyflexing of teaching and learning (Hybrid-Flexible or Hyflex model) which combines the traditional in-class interaction, online synchronous sessions and asynchronous content delivery.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Evaluation of a Customised Online Learning Environment – A Student Perspective
AU  - Robert Oliwa
Y1  - 2022/03/04
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12
T2  - Education Journal
JF  - Education Journal
JO  - Education Journal
SP  - 63
EP  - 69
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2619
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20221102.12
AB  - The present study aimed to examine how students evaluate the online learning environment after eight months of its use. The scope and functionalities of the online platform had been recommended by its future users in the process of the platform design and construction. Once the platform was implemented, it constituted the main instructional means in the pandemic period and is being considered to be further used in post-COVID, hybrid model of education. The students who participated in the study encompassed all the undergraduate and postgraduate students of a medium sized tertiary institution. The data was collected with the help of an online survey tool. The online surveys were distributed to all the students after eight months of the distance instruction and made available for the period of four months. The author wished to examine and assess the outcomes concerning the students’ perception of the platform in three areas, namely teaching remote classes, conducting student evaluation and reporting their activity. The study revealed positive opinions relating to being given an opportunity to continue studies during the pandemic, the accessibility of online resources and the functionalities the platform offers. Less approving views were expressed in relation to the online communication tools, the methods of teaching and assessment as well as the opportunity to improve IT competence. A possible direction which the contemporary education might take is hyflexing of teaching and learning (Hybrid-Flexible or Hyflex model) which combines the traditional in-class interaction, online synchronous sessions and asynchronous content delivery.
VL  - 11
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download