Relationship Between School Autonomy and Students’ Academic Achievement in Government Secondary Schools in East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia

Shimelis Sahilu; Ziyn Engdasew; Garkebo Basha; Feyera Dinsa

doi:doi:10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Relationship Between School Autonomy and Students’ Academic Achievement in Government Secondary Schools in East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia

Shimelis Sahilu, Ziyn Engdasew, Garkebo Basha, Feyera Dinsa

Published in Education Journal (Volume 11, Issue 2)

Received: 7 February 2022 Accepted: 26 February 2022 Published: 4 March 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The aim of school autonomy is to improve the education quality by independence and flexibility in managing existing resources. Regardless of this trend, amazingly little is known about how schools use autonomy in practice, and there were many controversies regarding the relationship between school autonomy and students’ academic achievement. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the magnitude of relationship between the areas of school autonomy and students’ academic achievement in the secondary schools in the study area. The study employed adescriptive-correlational survey research design with a mixed methods approach. A total of 522 respondents (secondary school principals n=20, teachers n=347, and zone and district education office experts n=155) were used as samples. The sample schools were selected by stratified random sampling and the respondents were selected by simple random sampling using RAND or RANDBETWEEN function on Microsoft Excel. Closed-ended questionnaires were employed for gathering quantitative data from the respondents, and concurrently telephone interview and document analysiswere conducted to collect the qualitative data. The Pearson correlation and multiple regression statistical tests were used to measure and describe the significance of the association (or relationship) between the variables or sets of scores. Moreover, t-test was also conducted to test the difference between the teachers and experts. Analysis of the results demonstrated that majority of the respondents perceived school autonomy positively. Moreover, even though the flow of improvement was not constant, it seems that there were few improvements in students’ academic achievement as a result of the practices of school autonomy. The findings also show that there were a number of constraining factors of school autonomy in the study area. The overall conclusion drawn from the results of this study was that: granting autonomy to secondary schools may be the best idea for the better performance of educational systems in the study area along with removing the constraining factors such as lack of training, knowledge, directives/guidelines and school facilities, and financial corruption. Furthermore, similar to many of the developed countries, practice of school autonomy in developing countries was also one of the means to improve students’ academic achievement. Therefore, it can be recommended that the national, regional and district education authorities and researchers have to focus on implementation of the school autonomy along with building the capacity of the school leaders.

Published in	Education Journal (Volume 11, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11
Page(s)	49-62
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Academic Autonomy, Financial Management Autonomy, Personnel Management Autonomy, School Autonomy, Students’ Academic Achievement

References

[1]	Abdulkadiroglu, A., Angrist, J. D., Dynarski, S. M., Kane, T. J., and Pathak, P. A. 2011. Accountability and Flexibility in Public Schools: Evidence from Boston’sCharters and Pilots. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 699-748. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr017.
[2]	Abdulkadiroglu, A., Angrist, J. D., Hull, P. D., and Pathak, P. A. 2016. ChartersWithoutlotteries: testing takeovers in New Orleans and Boston. The American Economic Review, 106 (7): 1878–1920.
[3]	Altrichter, H., M. Heinrich, and K. Soukup-Altrichter. 2014. “School Decentralizationas a Process of Differentiation, Hierarchization and Selection.” Journal of Education Policy 29 (5), 675 – 699.
[4]	Angrist, J. D., Dynarski, S. M., Kane, T. J., Pathak, P. A., and Walters, C. R. 2010. Inputsand impacts in charter schools: KIPP Lynn. American Economic Review, 100 (2): 239–243.
[5]	Arcia, G., Macdonald, K., Patrinos, H., and Porta, E. 2011. School autonomy and Accountability. SABER. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/21546.
[6]	AyalewShibeshi. 2009. Overview of education research in Ethiopia studies, Journal of Ethiopian Studies XLII. 1–2 141–74.
[7]	Balnaves, M., and Caputi, P. 2001. Introduction to quantitative research methods: Anintegrative approach. London: Sage Publications.
[8]	Barrera-Osorio, F., and Linden, L., 2009. The use and misuse of computers in education: evidence from a randomized experiment in ColombiaIn: WB Policy ResearchWorking Papers No. 4836.
[9]	Barrera, F., Fasih, T., Patrinos, H., and Santibanez, L. 2009. Decentralized Decision Making in Schools. The Theory and Evidence on School-Based Management. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
[10]	Cheng, Y. C., Theodoreand Lee. 2016. “School Autonomy, Leadership and Learning: A Reconceptualization.” International Journal of Educational Management 30 (2), 177–196.
[11]	Cheusheva, S. 2021. How to Select Random Sample in Excel. https://www.ablebits.com/office-addins-blog/2018/01/31/excel-random-Selection-random-sample.
[12]	Cochran, W. G. 1977. Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
[13]	Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research design (4^th ed.): Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodsapproaches. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Sage.
[14]	Daun, H. 2010. “The New Mode of Governance in European Education – in the Contextof Globalization and EU-ification.”. Orbisscholae 4 (2), 115 –131.
[15]	Di Gropello, E. 2004. Educational Decentralization and Accountability Structure in LatinAmerican and the Caribbean Region. International Handbook of SchoolEffectiveness and Improvement, 17, 503-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5747-2_28.
[16]	Dobbie, W. and Fryer, R. G. 2015. The medium-term impacts of high-achieving charterschools. Journal of Political Economy, 123 (5): 985–1037.
[17]	Dynarski, S., Hubbard, D., Jacob, B., and Robles, S. 2018. Estimating the effects of alarge for-profit charter school operator. NBER Working Paper No. 24428.
[18]	Eskeland, G. S., and Filmer D. 2002. Autonomy, Participation, and Learning in Argentine Schools. Vol. 2766. World Bank Publications. The Determinants ofGerman Students’ Achievement in the PISA 2000-2009 Study. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=392040.
[19]	Eurydice. 2007. School Autonomy in Europe: Policies and Measures.
[20]	Fuchs, T., and Woessmann, L. 2007. What Accounts for InternationalDifferences in Student Performance? A Re-Examination Using PISA Data. Empirical Economics, 32, 433-464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-006-0087-0.
[21]	Hanushek and Woessmann. 2011. The Economics of International Differences inEducational Achievement. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, and L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education Vol. 3, pp. 146-184. North Holland.
[22]	Hsieh, Y. Y., Vergne, J. P., Anderson, P., Lakhani, K., and Reitzig, M. 2018. Bitcoin and therise of decentralized autonomous organizations. Journal of Organization Design, 7 (1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-018-0038-1.
[23]	Karlsen, G. E. 2000. “Decentralized Centralism; Framework for a Better Understandingof Governance in the Field of Education.” Journal of Educational Policy 15 (50), 525–538.
[24]	Kothari, K. 2004. Research Methodology, Method and Techniques: Jaipur, Universityof Rajasthan.
[25]	Lenos, R., Muralidharan, K., and Scur, D. 2017. Personnel management and schoolproductivity: Evidence from India. Paper presented at Empirical ManagementConference of the World Bank.
[26]	Nandamuri, P., and Rao, K. 2012. An Analysis of the Impact of Professional Training onthePerformance of Teachers. IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 6 (3), 20–27.
[27]	Naper, R. 2010. Teacher Hiring Practices and Educational Efficiency. Economics ofEducation Review, 29, 658-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.08.002.
[28]	Neeleman, A. J. 2019. “The scope of school autonomy in practice: An empirically basedclassification of school interventions”, Journal of Educational Change, 20, pp: 31–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-018-9332-5.
[29]	Olsen, J. P. 2008. The ups and downs of bureaucratic organization. Annual Review ofPolitical Science, 11, 13-37.
[30]	Sholderer, O. 2017. Making Education Work: School Autonomy and Performance. Department of Public Administration Leiden University. East European Quarterly, 45, 27-56. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3030700.
[31]	Umansky, I. 2005. CentralAmerica: Education Strategies to Support Education forAll. Invited talk, Central American Regional UNESCO Education for All Conference, San Salvador, El Salvador, November 2005.
[32]	Vegas, E., andPetrow, J. 2008. Raising Student Learning in Latin America: The Challenge for the 21st Century. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7082-7.
[33]	Verger, A., and Curran, M. 2014. New Public Management as a global education policy: Its adoption and re-contextualization in a Southern European setting. Critical Studies in Education, 55 (3), 253-271.
[34]	Woessmann, L. 2001. Why students in some countries do better: International Evidenceon the Importanceof Education Policy, Education Matters1: 67-74.
[35]	Woessmann, L.; Luedemann, E., Schutz, G. and West, R. 2009. School accountability, autonomy, and choice around the world. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
[36]	World Bank. 2013. Secondary education in Ethiopia. Supporting growth andtransformation. Washington DC, TheWorld Bank.
[37]	WorknehAbebe. 2012. School management and decision making in EthiopianGovernmentschools: evidence from the young lives qualitative school survey. Addis Ababa.
[38]	Yamane, T. 1967. Statistics, an Introductory Analysis (2nd Ed.). Harper and Row.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Shimelis Sahilu, Ziyn Engdasew, Garkebo Basha, Feyera Dinsa. (2022). Relationship Between School Autonomy and Students’ Academic Achievement in Government Secondary Schools in East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Education Journal, 11(2), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Shimelis Sahilu; Ziyn Engdasew; Garkebo Basha; Feyera Dinsa. Relationship Between School Autonomy and Students’ Academic Achievement in Government Secondary Schools in East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Educ. J. 2022, 11(2), 49-62. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Shimelis Sahilu, Ziyn Engdasew, Garkebo Basha, Feyera Dinsa. Relationship Between School Autonomy and Students’ Academic Achievement in Government Secondary Schools in East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Educ J. 2022;11(2):49-62. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11,
  author = {Shimelis Sahilu and Ziyn Engdasew and Garkebo Basha and Feyera Dinsa},
  title = {Relationship Between School Autonomy and Students’ Academic Achievement in Government Secondary Schools in East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia},
  journal = {Education Journal},
  volume = {11},
  number = {2},
  pages = {49-62},
  doi = {10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.edu.20221102.11},
  abstract = {The aim of school autonomy is to improve the education quality by independence and flexibility in managing existing resources. Regardless of this trend, amazingly little is known about how schools use autonomy in practice, and there were many controversies regarding the relationship between school autonomy and students’ academic achievement. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the magnitude of relationship between the areas of school autonomy and students’ academic achievement in the secondary schools in the study area. The study employed adescriptive-correlational survey research design with a mixed methods approach. A total of 522 respondents (secondary school principals n=20, teachers n=347, and zone and district education office experts n=155) were used as samples. The sample schools were selected by stratified random sampling and the respondents were selected by simple random sampling using RAND or RANDBETWEEN function on Microsoft Excel. Closed-ended questionnaires were employed for gathering quantitative data from the respondents, and concurrently telephone interview and document analysiswere conducted to collect the qualitative data. The Pearson correlation and multiple regression statistical tests were used to measure and describe the significance of the association (or relationship) between the variables or sets of scores. Moreover, t-test was also conducted to test the difference between the teachers and experts. Analysis of the results demonstrated that majority of the respondents perceived school autonomy positively. Moreover, even though the flow of improvement was not constant, it seems that there were few improvements in students’ academic achievement as a result of the practices of school autonomy. The findings also show that there were a number of constraining factors of school autonomy in the study area. The overall conclusion drawn from the results of this study was that: granting autonomy to secondary schools may be the best idea for the better performance of educational systems in the study area along with removing the constraining factors such as lack of training, knowledge, directives/guidelines and school facilities, and financial corruption. Furthermore, similar to many of the developed countries, practice of school autonomy in developing countries was also one of the means to improve students’ academic achievement. Therefore, it can be recommended that the national, regional and district education authorities and researchers have to focus on implementation of the school autonomy along with building the capacity of the school leaders.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Relationship Between School Autonomy and Students’ Academic Achievement in Government Secondary Schools in East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia
AU  - Shimelis Sahilu
AU  - Ziyn Engdasew
AU  - Garkebo Basha
AU  - Feyera Dinsa
Y1  - 2022/03/04
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11
T2  - Education Journal
JF  - Education Journal
JO  - Education Journal
SP  - 49
EP  - 62
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2619
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11
AB  - The aim of school autonomy is to improve the education quality by independence and flexibility in managing existing resources. Regardless of this trend, amazingly little is known about how schools use autonomy in practice, and there were many controversies regarding the relationship between school autonomy and students’ academic achievement. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the magnitude of relationship between the areas of school autonomy and students’ academic achievement in the secondary schools in the study area. The study employed adescriptive-correlational survey research design with a mixed methods approach. A total of 522 respondents (secondary school principals n=20, teachers n=347, and zone and district education office experts n=155) were used as samples. The sample schools were selected by stratified random sampling and the respondents were selected by simple random sampling using RAND or RANDBETWEEN function on Microsoft Excel. Closed-ended questionnaires were employed for gathering quantitative data from the respondents, and concurrently telephone interview and document analysiswere conducted to collect the qualitative data. The Pearson correlation and multiple regression statistical tests were used to measure and describe the significance of the association (or relationship) between the variables or sets of scores. Moreover, t-test was also conducted to test the difference between the teachers and experts. Analysis of the results demonstrated that majority of the respondents perceived school autonomy positively. Moreover, even though the flow of improvement was not constant, it seems that there were few improvements in students’ academic achievement as a result of the practices of school autonomy. The findings also show that there were a number of constraining factors of school autonomy in the study area. The overall conclusion drawn from the results of this study was that: granting autonomy to secondary schools may be the best idea for the better performance of educational systems in the study area along with removing the constraining factors such as lack of training, knowledge, directives/guidelines and school facilities, and financial corruption. Furthermore, similar to many of the developed countries, practice of school autonomy in developing countries was also one of the means to improve students’ academic achievement. Therefore, it can be recommended that the national, regional and district education authorities and researchers have to focus on implementation of the school autonomy along with building the capacity of the school leaders.
VL  - 11
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Shimelis Sahilu

Department of Educational Planning and Management, College of Education and Behavioral Sciences, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia
Ziyn Engdasew

Department of Educational Planning and Management, College of Education and Behavioral Sciences, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia
Garkebo Basha

Department of Educational Planning and Management, College of Education and Behavioral Sciences, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia
Feyera Dinsa

Department of Educational Planning and Management, College of Education and Behavioral Sciences, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Shimelis Sahilu, Ziyn Engdasew, Garkebo Basha, Feyera Dinsa. (2022). Relationship Between School Autonomy and Students’ Academic Achievement in Government Secondary Schools in East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Education Journal, 11(2), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Shimelis Sahilu; Ziyn Engdasew; Garkebo Basha; Feyera Dinsa. Relationship Between School Autonomy and Students’ Academic Achievement in Government Secondary Schools in East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Educ. J. 2022, 11(2), 49-62. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Shimelis Sahilu, Ziyn Engdasew, Garkebo Basha, Feyera Dinsa. Relationship Between School Autonomy and Students’ Academic Achievement in Government Secondary Schools in East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Educ J. 2022;11(2):49-62. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11,
  author = {Shimelis Sahilu and Ziyn Engdasew and Garkebo Basha and Feyera Dinsa},
  title = {Relationship Between School Autonomy and Students’ Academic Achievement in Government Secondary Schools in East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia},
  journal = {Education Journal},
  volume = {11},
  number = {2},
  pages = {49-62},
  doi = {10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.edu.20221102.11},
  abstract = {The aim of school autonomy is to improve the education quality by independence and flexibility in managing existing resources. Regardless of this trend, amazingly little is known about how schools use autonomy in practice, and there were many controversies regarding the relationship between school autonomy and students’ academic achievement. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the magnitude of relationship between the areas of school autonomy and students’ academic achievement in the secondary schools in the study area. The study employed adescriptive-correlational survey research design with a mixed methods approach. A total of 522 respondents (secondary school principals n=20, teachers n=347, and zone and district education office experts n=155) were used as samples. The sample schools were selected by stratified random sampling and the respondents were selected by simple random sampling using RAND or RANDBETWEEN function on Microsoft Excel. Closed-ended questionnaires were employed for gathering quantitative data from the respondents, and concurrently telephone interview and document analysiswere conducted to collect the qualitative data. The Pearson correlation and multiple regression statistical tests were used to measure and describe the significance of the association (or relationship) between the variables or sets of scores. Moreover, t-test was also conducted to test the difference between the teachers and experts. Analysis of the results demonstrated that majority of the respondents perceived school autonomy positively. Moreover, even though the flow of improvement was not constant, it seems that there were few improvements in students’ academic achievement as a result of the practices of school autonomy. The findings also show that there were a number of constraining factors of school autonomy in the study area. The overall conclusion drawn from the results of this study was that: granting autonomy to secondary schools may be the best idea for the better performance of educational systems in the study area along with removing the constraining factors such as lack of training, knowledge, directives/guidelines and school facilities, and financial corruption. Furthermore, similar to many of the developed countries, practice of school autonomy in developing countries was also one of the means to improve students’ academic achievement. Therefore, it can be recommended that the national, regional and district education authorities and researchers have to focus on implementation of the school autonomy along with building the capacity of the school leaders.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Relationship Between School Autonomy and Students’ Academic Achievement in Government Secondary Schools in East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia
AU  - Shimelis Sahilu
AU  - Ziyn Engdasew
AU  - Garkebo Basha
AU  - Feyera Dinsa
Y1  - 2022/03/04
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11
T2  - Education Journal
JF  - Education Journal
JO  - Education Journal
SP  - 49
EP  - 62
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2619
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20221102.11
AB  - The aim of school autonomy is to improve the education quality by independence and flexibility in managing existing resources. Regardless of this trend, amazingly little is known about how schools use autonomy in practice, and there were many controversies regarding the relationship between school autonomy and students’ academic achievement. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the magnitude of relationship between the areas of school autonomy and students’ academic achievement in the secondary schools in the study area. The study employed adescriptive-correlational survey research design with a mixed methods approach. A total of 522 respondents (secondary school principals n=20, teachers n=347, and zone and district education office experts n=155) were used as samples. The sample schools were selected by stratified random sampling and the respondents were selected by simple random sampling using RAND or RANDBETWEEN function on Microsoft Excel. Closed-ended questionnaires were employed for gathering quantitative data from the respondents, and concurrently telephone interview and document analysiswere conducted to collect the qualitative data. The Pearson correlation and multiple regression statistical tests were used to measure and describe the significance of the association (or relationship) between the variables or sets of scores. Moreover, t-test was also conducted to test the difference between the teachers and experts. Analysis of the results demonstrated that majority of the respondents perceived school autonomy positively. Moreover, even though the flow of improvement was not constant, it seems that there were few improvements in students’ academic achievement as a result of the practices of school autonomy. The findings also show that there were a number of constraining factors of school autonomy in the study area. The overall conclusion drawn from the results of this study was that: granting autonomy to secondary schools may be the best idea for the better performance of educational systems in the study area along with removing the constraining factors such as lack of training, knowledge, directives/guidelines and school facilities, and financial corruption. Furthermore, similar to many of the developed countries, practice of school autonomy in developing countries was also one of the means to improve students’ academic achievement. Therefore, it can be recommended that the national, regional and district education authorities and researchers have to focus on implementation of the school autonomy along with building the capacity of the school leaders.
VL  - 11
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download